//
you're reading...
news, Politics

>Aarushi Case, Allahabad HC Rejects Talwar Couple’s Plea | was aarushi talwar virgin | aarushi talwar virginity | aarushi talwar virgin | was aarushi talwar a virgin | was aarushi talwar virgin? | was arushi talwar virgin

>

The Allahabad High Court has rejected pleas filed by both Nupur Talwar and Rajesh Talwar in the Arushi Murder case. They had appealed against a summon issued by CBI Court, which found prime facie case against them on the basis of CBI closure report.

“There is no provision for prohibiting a magistrate from summoning a person if prima facie it appears that there is sufficient evidence against the person,” Justice Balakrishna Narayana said in his order on a petition filed by Nupur Talwar against a Special CBI court’s order in Ghaziabad.

The judge dismissed the criminal revision petition of Nupur against the CBI court proceedings saying the petition has “failed to provide any valid reason warranting the court’s intervention at this stage”.

Besides, Justice Narayana observed that the CBI court order of Feb 9 was passed after a “perusal of the case diary and appears to be in order”.

On February 9 the Ghaziabad court had issued bailable warrants against the couple for their failure to appear before the court and to initiate proceedings against them after it had named them accused while rejecting the closure report of the CBI. The closure report was made the chargesheet.

The court asked Nupur, who had submitted that she had been summoned despite never having been called for interrogation or having been named as an accused in the CBI’s clousre report, to appear before the trial court within two weeks.

She could move a bail application there itself “which may be decided on the same day, if possible,” the court observed.

Another petition filed by Rajesh Talwar challenging bailable warrants issued by the Ghaziabad court on February 28 was dismissed by Justice Ravindra Singh.

Rejecting Rajesh’s contention that he was out on a regular bail and hence the lower court should not not issued bailable warrants against him without first cancelling the bail, Justice Singh remarked that Rajesh was released from jail in July, 2008 under Section 169 of the Cr. P.C. which was an interim arrangement”.

Advertisements

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: